I was a 24-year-old honorably discharged Marine when I was convicted and sentenced to death for a tragic crime that I did not commit. I was exonerated in 1993, and the real perpetrator, who had gone on to commit more brutal crimes while I sat innocent on death row, was eventually convicted.
Sadly, my story is not unique — 167 people have been exonerated after having been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death. For every nine people executed in our country, one person has been exonerated. This statistic should make us nervous about the very real risk of executing an innocent person.
Missouri was planning to execute Walter Barton on Tuesday, before a federal court gave him a 30-day reprieve Friday to review issues raised by his attorneys. There are troubling similarities between Mr. Barton’s case and those of the 167 men and women who were fortunate to be exonerated before their death sentences were carried out.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center, the top three causes of wrongful convictions in death penalty cases are official misconduct, perjury or false accusation, and false or misleading forensic evidence. All three of these issues are present in Mr. Barton’s case.
Official misconduct (present in over 80% of wrongful death sentences): Mr. Barton’s five trials were full of what Missouri Supreme Court Justices have called “mishaps and misdeeds,” including official misconduct when a prosecutor withheld critical information.
Perjury/false accusation (present in over 75% of wrongful death sentences): A key witness against Mr. Barton was a jailhouse informant who had a criminal charge against her dismissed in exchange for her testimony. Such jailhouse informants make up the vast majority of perjury and false accusations found in wrongful convictions.
False/misleading forensic evidence (present in over 30% of wrongful death sentences): New analysis of forensic evidence in Mr. Barton’s case contradicts the state expert’s testimony at trial and instead supports the idea that Mr. Barton is innocent.
An execution is irreversible. It is the highest and most severe punishment, and so it should be held to the highest standards of accountability. But in Mr. Barton’s case, his first trial ended in a mistrial due to actions of the prosecutor, his second trial ended in a mistrial because the jury could not agree upon guilt, the conviction at his third trial was overturned due to actions of the judge, the conviction at his fourth trial was overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct, and in the direct appeal of his fifth trial, the Missouri Supreme Court was split four to three in its verdict. That means three of the people entrusted to best understand Missouri law believe that Mr. Barton should not be executed next week.
Is this death sentence being held to the highest standards of accountability? The only way for Missourians to be 100% sure an innocent person is not killed in their names is to abolish the death penalty. As a man who was nearly killed for a crime I did not commit, I urge Gov. Mike Parson not to execute Walter Barton.
Read the full story in the Columbia Daily Tribune or in the Columbia Missourian.
For more information about the case and how to get involved go to MADPO.
Sign the petition to stop the execution.